|
Hip joint range of rotation in adolescent girls with scoliosis depending on the curve pattern (Lenke classification). |
||||
| Parameter |
Lenke I N = 57 |
Lenke III and VI N = 71 |
Lenke V N = 30 |
P value |
|
|
||||
| Internal rotation Right hip |
50.4 ± 13.4 (25 ÷ 80) |
51.4 ± 14.4 (20 ÷ 90) |
50.2 ± 11.8 (30 ÷ 75) |
NS |
| Internal rotation Left hip |
48.9 ± 12.7 (20 ÷ 80) |
52.9 ± 15.0 (20 ÷ 90) |
52.4 ± 11.1 (30 ÷ 80) |
NS |
| External rotation Right hip |
34.5 ± 13.3 (5 ÷ 60) |
35.2 ± 12.2 (10 ÷ 60) |
35.2 ± 12.2 (20 ÷ 60) |
NS |
| External rotation Left hip |
35.1 ± 10.4 (15 ÷ 60) |
35.1 ± 12.7 (5 ÷ 60) |
34.6 ± 11.4 (10 ÷ 60) |
NS |
| Total range rotation Right hip |
84.7 ± 15.0 (55 ÷ 130) |
87.1 ± 17.1 (50 ÷ 140) |
87.1 ± 13.6 (65 ÷ 120) |
NS |
| Total range rotation Left hip |
84.2 ± 14.3 (60 ÷ 125) |
88.2 ± 17.4 (60 ÷ 140) |
87.1 ± 15.7 (60 ÷ 130) |
NS |
| Difference in IR: Right minus left |
1.5 ± 9.8 (-15 ÷ 20) |
-1.4 ± 9.8 (-30 ÷ 20) |
-2.1 ± 9.8 (-15 ÷ 15) |
NS |
| Difference in ER: Right minus left |
-0.5 ± 9.7 (-20 ÷ 20) |
0.1 ± 10.1 (-25 ÷ 30) |
1.2 ± 6.5 (-15 ÷ 10) |
NS |
| Absolute difference left-right in IR |
8.6 ± 4.7 (0 ÷ 20) |
7.6 ± 6.3 (0 ÷ 30) |
9.2 ± 4.2 (0 ÷ 15) |
NS |
| Absolute difference left-right in ER |
8.0 ± 5.4 (0 ÷ 20) |
7.7 ± 6.5 (0 ÷ 30) |
4.5 ± 4.9 (0 ÷ 15) |
0.0194 |
| Mid-point of rotation for right hip |
8.0 ± 11.0 (-10 ÷ 37,5) |
8.1 ± 10.1 (-15 ÷ 27.5) |
6.6 ± 9.4 (-10 ÷ 27.5) |
NS |
| Mid-point of rotation for left hip |
6.6 ± 8.9 (-12,5 ÷ 25) |
8.8 ± 10.8 (-15 ÷ 37.5) |
8.9 ± 8.0 (-7.5 ÷ 25) |
NS |
| Static rotational offset of the pelvis |
7.6 ± 4.8 (0 ÷ 20) |
6.8 ± 5.9 (0 ÷ 25) |
6.0 ± 3.8 (0 ÷ 12.5) |
NS |
|
The means and standard deviations are given, followed by minimum and maximum in the brackets. IR – internal rotation, ER – external rotation. One way ANOVA was used for normal distribution, Kruskal-Wallis test for not normal. The values of the three columns do not differ significantly, apart from the absolute difference of the range of external rotation, signifying less asymmetry in Lenke V curves. | ||||
Kotwicki et al. Scoliosis 2008 3:1 doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-1 |
||||