Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Scoliosis and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Specific exercises performed in the period of brace weaning can avoid loss of correction in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients: Winner of SOSORT's 2008 Award for Best Clinical Paper

Fabio Zaina1*, Stefano Negrini1, Salvatore Atanasio2, Claudia Fusco1, Michele Romano1 and Alessandra Negrini2

Author Affiliations

1 ISICO Milano(Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Via Bellarmino 13/1, 20141 Milan, Italy

2 ISICO Vigevano, Corso Pavia 37, 27029 Vigevano (PV), Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

Scoliosis 2009, 4:8  doi:10.1186/1748-7161-4-8

Published: 7 April 2009

Abstract

Background

Exercises are frequently performed in order to improve the efficacy of bracing and avoid its collateral effects. Very frequently there is a loss of correction during brace weaning in AIS treatment.

Aim

To verify the efficacy of exercises in reducing correction loss during brace weaning.

Study Design

Retrospective controlled study.

Population

Sixty-eight consecutive patients (eight males), age 15 ± 1 and Cobb angle 22 ± 8° at start of brace weaning.

Methods

The start of brace weaning was defined as the first visit in which the wearing of brace for less than 18/24 hours was prescribed (according to our protocol, at Risser 3). Patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not exercises were performed: (1) EX (exercises), included 39 patients and was further divided into two sub-groups: SEAS (who performed exercises according to our institute's protocol, 14 patients) and OTH (other exercises, 25 patients) and (2) CON (controls, 29 patients) that was divided into two other sub-groups: DIS (discontinuous exercises, 19 patients) and NO (no exercises, 10 patients). Complete brace weaning was defined as the first visit in which the brace was no longer prescribed (ringapophysis closure or Risser 5, according to our protocol).

ANOVA and Chi Square tests were performed.

Results

There was no difference between groups at baseline. However, at the end of treatment, 2.7 years after the start of the weaning process, Cobb angle increased significantly in both the DIS and NO groups (3.9° and 3.1° Cobb, respectively). The SEAS and OTH groups did not change. Comparing single groups, OTH (with respect to DIS) had a significant difference (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Exercises can help reduce the correction loss in brace weaning for AIS.