|
| This article is part of the supplement: 5th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities . Oral presentationA radiographic evaluation of elasticity ın idiopathic scoliotic curves: are lateral bending films reliable enough to estimate curve elasticity?1st Department of Orthopaedics of the Medical School of Athens University, Athens, Greece
from 5th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities Scoliosis 2009, 4(Suppl 1):O12doi:10.1186/1748-7161-4-S1-O12 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/S1/O12
© 2009 Soultanis et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. BackgroundAssessment of the elasticity of scoliotic curves is an important factor to plan further treatment in idiopathic scoliosis. PurposeTo assess curve elasticity obtained from PA standing lateral bending radiographs in comparison to those taken when maximal manual supine traction is applied to the wrists and ankles in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Patients and methodsEvaluation of the elasticity of the scoliotic curve was done in 96 patients with idiopathic scoliosis with supine radiographs under manual traction and standing lateral bending radiographs. ResultsMeasurements taken from lateral bending radiographs provided more reliable estimates of the postoperative correction compared to radiographs using manual wrist to ankle traction. Lateral bending was a more effective method to assess lumbar and thoracolumbar curves. The two tests were simiIar in ability to evaluate the elasticity of thoracic curves. A lack of patient cooperation in movement was attributed to inadequate assessment of curve elasticity seen in some of the lateral bending radiographs. ConclusionThe lateral bending test usually is superior to manual traction method. Both methods for estimation of curve elasticity may be recommended because of the frequent, lack of patient cooperation in the lateral bending test. This compliance issue may result in an underestimation of the actual achieved correction. References
Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |




on Google Scholar







corresponding author email