|
| This article is part of the supplement: 6th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities . Oral presentationAn early stage brace wear pattern during daily activities for AIS1 Department of Rehabilitation Technology, Glenrose Rehabilitation Hospital - Edmonton, AB Canada 2 2 Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
from 6th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities Scoliosis 2009, 4(Suppl 2):O35doi:10.1186/1748-7161-4-S2-O35 The electronic version of this abstract is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/S2/O35
© 2009 Lou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. ObjectiveTo evaluate changes in compliance including both wear tightness and wear time during early brace treatment for AIS. BackgroundThe efficacy of brace treatment for children with AIS has been hampered by the lack of comprehensive information about wear characteristics. Our group developed a reliable brace compliance monitoring system to measure and record the temporal profile of the loads on the pressure pad imposed on the trunk during daily living. MethodThe brace compliance monitoring system was used to monitor how new brace subjects used their braces during first 4 months. Six AIS subjects (5 F, 1 M), between 10 and 13 years old (12.3 + 1.0 years), prescribed TLSO with full time wear (22 hours per day) were monitored starting at the beginning of their brace treatment. The Cobb angles were measured at the initial visit, 4 weeks after the final brace fitting (in-brace) and the first follow-up visit (out-of-brace) approximately 4 months after initiation. The force average relative to the prescribed tightness level (set as 1.0) and the monthly force comparison were reported. The average wear time and monthly wearing pattern were calculated. ResultsThe brace monitor logged the data for 4 months without any data loss. The initial, the in-brace and the follow-up Cobb angles were 33 ± 4, 21 ± 3, and 35 ± 5 degrees, respectively. During this study period, the daily force average relative to the prescribed level was 0.97 ± 0.20. The average force from month 1 to 4 was 1.12 ± 0.23, 1.02 ± 0.20, 0.92 ± 0.18, 0.83 ± 0.19, respectively. The average wear time relative to the prescribed time was 56 ± 15%. The monthly wear time from month 1 to 4 were 52 ± 8.6, 54 ± 13, 59 ± 16, 59 ± 21%, respectively. All subjects are still on their brace treatment. ConclusionDuring the first 4 months of brace use, the wear time improves but brace tightness is lower. Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |




on Google Scholar








author email
corresponding author email