<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/feeds/latestarticles/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Scoliosis - Latest Articles</title>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com</link>
        <description>The latest research articles published by Scoliosis</description>
        <dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/10" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/8" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/1" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/10">
        <title>Optimization of the examination posture in spinal curvature assessment
</title>
        <description>To decrease the influence of postural sway during spinal measurements, an instrumented fixation posture (called G) was proposed and tested in comparison with the free standing posture (A) using the DTP-3 system in a group of 70 healthy volunteers. The measurement was performed 5 times on each subject and each position was tested by a newly developed device for non-invasive spinal measurements called DTP-3 system. Changes in postural stability of the spinous processes for each subject/the whole group were evaluated by employing standard statistical tools. Posture G, when compared to posture A, reduced postural sway significantly in all spinous processes from C3 to L5 in both the mediolateral and anterioposterior directions. Posture G also significantly reduced postural sway in the vertical direction in 18 out of 22 spinous processes. Importantly, posture G did not significantly influence the spinal curvature.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/10</link>
                <dc:creator>Jakub Krejci</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jiri Gallo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Petr Stepanik</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jiri Salinger</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:10</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-10</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-10-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>10</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/9">
        <title>School screening for scoliosis: can surface topography replace examination with scoliometer?</title>
        <description>Background:
Clinical examination with the use of scoliometer is a basic method for scoliosis detection in school screening programs. Surface topography (ST) enables three-dimensional back assessment, however it has not been adopted for the purpose of scoliosis screening yet. The purpose of this study was to assess the usefulness of ST for scoliosis screening.
Methods:
996 girls aged 9 to 13 years were examined, with both scoliometer and surface topography. The Surface Trunk Rotation (STR) was introduced and defined as a parameter allowing comparison with scoliometer Angle of Trunk Rotation taken as reference.
Results:
Intra-observer error for STR parameter was 1.9&#176;, inter-observer error was 0.8&#176;. Sensitivity and specificity of ST were not satisfactory, the screening cut-off value of the surface topography parameter could not be established.
Conclusions:
The study did not reveal advantage of ST as a scoliosis screening method in comparison to clinical examination with the use of the scoliometer.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Joanna Chowanska</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Krzysztof Rosadzinski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Zbigniew Sliwinski</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-04-03T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-04-03T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/8">
        <title>Significance of hanging total spine x-ray to estimate the indicative correction angle by brace wearing in idiopathic scoliosis patients</title>
        <description>Background:
Although most idiopathic scoliosis patients subject to conservative treatment in daily clinical practice, there have been no ideal methods to evaluate the spinal flexibility for the patients who are scheduled the brace treatment. The purpose of this study was to investigate the value of hanging total spine x-ray to estimate the indicative correction angle by brace wearing in idiopathic scoliosis patients.
Methods:
One hundred seventy-six consecutive patients with idiopathic scoliosis who were newly prescribed the Osaka Medical College (OMC) brace were studied. The study included 14 boys and 162 girls with a mean age of 13 years and 1 month. The type of curves consisted of 62 thoracic, 23 thoracolumbar, 22 lumbar, 42 double major, 14 double thoracic, and 13 triple curve pattern. We compared the Cobb angles on initial brace wearing (BA) and in hanging position (HA). Of those, 108 patients who had main thoracic curves were selected and evaluated the corrective ability of OMC brace. These subjects were divided into three groups according to the relation between BA and HA (BA &lt; HA group, BA = HA group, and BA &gt; HA group), and then, maturity was compared among them.
Results:
The average Cobb angle in upright position (UA) of all cases was 31.0 &#177; 7.8&#176;. The average BA and HA of all cases were 20.3 &#177; 9.5&#176; and 21.1 &#177; 8.4&#176;, respectively. The average chronological age was lowest in BA &lt; HA group. And also, maturity in BA &lt; HA group was the lowest among each of them. The rate of BA &lt; HA cases were decreased as the Risser stage of the patients were progressed.
Conclusions:
The use of hanging total spine x-ray served as a useful tool to estimate the degree of correction possible curve within the OMC brace for main thoracic curve in idiopathic scoliosis. Maturity had some influence on the correlation between HA and BA. Namely, in immature patients, HA tended to be larger than BA. In contrast, in mature patients, HA had a tendency to be smaller than BA. With consideration for spinal flexibility based on maturity, in mature patients, larger BA than HA may be allowed. However, in immature patients, smaller BA than HA should be aimed.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/8</link>
                <dc:creator>Hiroshi Kuroki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naoki Inomata</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hideaki Hamanaka</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Etsuo Chosa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Naoya Tajima</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:8</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-8</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-8-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>8</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/7">
        <title>Pulmonary function in children with idiopathic scoliosis</title>
        <description>Idiopathic scoliosis, a common disorder of lateral displacement and rotation of vertebral bodies during periods of rapid somatic growth, has many effects on respiratory function. Scoliosis results in a restrictive lung disease with a multifactorial decrease in lung volumes, displaces the intrathoracic organs, impedes on the movement of ribs and affects the mechanics of the respiratory muscles. Scoliosis decreases the chest wall as well as the lung compliance and results in increased work of breathing at rest, during exercise and sleep. Pulmonary hypertension and respiratory failure may develop in severe disease. In this review the epidemiological and anatomical aspects of idiopathic scoliosis are noted, the pathophysiology and effects of idiopathic scoliosis on respiratory function are described, the pulmonary function testing including lung volumes, respiratory flow rates and airway resistance, chest wall movements, regional ventilation and perfusion, blood gases, response to exercise and sleep studies are presented. Preoperative pulmonary function testing required, as well as the effects of various surgical approaches on respiratory function are also discussed.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Theofanis Tsiligiannis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/6">
        <title>Brace technology thematic series: the progressive action short brace (PASB)</title>
        <description>Background:
The Progressive Action Short Brace (PASB) is a custom-made thoraco-lumbar-sacral orthosis (TLSO), devised in 1976 by Dr. Lorenzo Aulisa (Institute of Orthopedics at the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy). The PASB was designed to overcome the limits imposed by the trunk anatomy. Indeed, the particular geometry of the brace is able to generate internal forces that modify the elastic reaction of the spine. The PASB is indicated for the conservative treatment of lumbar and thoraco-lumbar scoliosis. The aim of this article is to explain the biomechanic principles of the PASB and the rationale underlying its design. Recently published studies reporting the results of PASB-based treatment of adolescent scoliotic patients are also discussed.Description and principlesOn the coronal plane, the upper margin of the PASB, at the side of the curve concavity, prevents the homolateral bending of the scoliotic curve. The opposite upper margin ends just beneath the apical vertebra. The principle underlying such configuration is that the deflection of the inferior tract of a curved elastic structure, fixed at the bottom end, causes straightening of its upper tract. Therefore, whenever the patient bends towards the convexity of the scoliotic curve, the spine is deflected. On the sagittal plane, the inferior margins of the PASB reach the pelvitrochanteric region, in order to stabilize the brace on the pelvis. The transverse section of the brace above the pelvic grip consists of asymmetrical ellipses. This allows the spine to rotate towards the concave side only, leading to the continuous generation of derotating moments. On the sagittal plane, the brace is contoured so as to reduce the lumbar lordosis. The PASB, by allowing only those movements counteracting the progression of the curve, is able to produce corrective forces that are not dissipated. Therefore, the brace is based on the principle that a constrained spine dynamics can achieve the correction of a curve by inverting the abnormal load distribution during skeletal growth.
Results:
Since its introduction in 1976, several studies have been published supporting the validity of the biomechanical principles to which the brace is inspired. In this article, we present the outcome of a case series comprising 110 patients with lumbar and thoraco-lumbar curves treated with PASB brace. Antero-posterior radiographs were used to estimate the curve magnitude (CM) and the torsion of the apical vertebra (TA) at 5 time points: beginning of treatment (t1), one year after the beginning of treatment (t2), intermediate time between t1 and t4 (t3), end of weaning (t4), 2-year minimum follow-up from t4 (t5). The average CM value was 29.3&#176;Cobb at t1 and 13.0&#176;Cobb at t5. TA was 15.8&#176; Perdroille at t1 and 5.0&#176; Perdriolle at t5. These results support the efficacy of the PASB in the management of scoliotic patients with lumbar and thoraco-lumbar curves.
Conclusion:
The results obtained in patients treated with the PASB confirm the validity of our original biomechanical approach. The efficacy of the PASB derives not only from its unique biomechanical features but also from the simplicity of its design, construction and management.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Angelo Gabriele Aulisa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Giuseppe Mastantuoni</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marco Laineri</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Francesco Falciglia</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Marco Giordano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Emanuele Marzetti</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vincenzo Guzzanti</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/5">
        <title>Segmental correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by all-screw fixation method in adolescents and young adults. Minimum 5 years follow-up with SF-36 questionnaire</title>
        <description>Background:
In our institution, the fixation technique in treating idiopathic scoliosis was shifted from hybrid fixation to the all-screw method beginning in 2000. We conducted this study to assess the intermediate -term outcome of all-screw method in treating adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Methods:
Forty-nine consecutive patients were retrospectively included with minimum of 5-year follow-up (mean, 6.1; range, 5.1-7.3 years). The average age of surgery was 18.5 &#177; 5.0 years. We assessed radiographic measurements at preoperative (Preop), postoperative (PO) and final follow-up (FFU) period. Curve correction rate, correction loss rate, complications, accuracy of pedicle screws and SF-36 scores were analyzed.
Results:
The average major curve was corrected from 58.0 &#177; 13.0&#176; Preop to 16.0 &#177; 9.0&#176; PO(p &lt; 0.0001), and increased to 18.4 &#177; 8.6&#176;(p = 0.12) FFU. This revealed a 72.7% correction rate and a correction loss of 2.4&#176; (3.92%). The thoracic kyphosis decreased little at FFU (22 &#177; 12&#176; to 20 &#177; 6&#176;, (p = 0.25)). Apical vertebral rotation decreased from 2.1 &#177; 0.8 PreOP to 0.8 &#177; 0.8 at FFU (Nash-Moe grading, p &lt; 0.01). Among total 831 pedicle screws, 56 (6.7%) were found to be malpositioned. Compared with 2069 age-matched Taiwanese, SF-36 scores showed inferior result in 2 variables: physical function and role physical.
Conclusion:
Follow-up more than 5 years, the authors suggest that all-screw method is an efficient and safe method.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Ching -Hsiao Yu</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Po-Quang Chen</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Shu-Chuang Ma</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Chee-Huan Pan</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-02-19T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-02-19T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/4">
        <title>Physical therapy intervention studies on idiopathic scoliosis-review with the focus on inclusion criteria1</title>
        <description>Background:
Studies investigating the outcome of conservative scoliosis treatment differ widely with respect to the inclusion criteria used. This study has been performed to investigate the possibility to find useful inclusion criteria for future prospective studies on physiotherapy (PT).Materials and methodsA PubMed search for outcome papers on PT was performed in order to detect study designs and inclusion criteria used.
Results:
Real outcome papers (start of treatment in immature samples/end results after the end of growth; controlled studies in adults with scoliosis with a follow-up of more than 5 years) have not been found. Some papers investigated mid-term effects of exercises, most were retrospective, few prospective and many included patient samples with questionable treatment indications.
Conclusion:
There is no outcome paper on PT in scoliosis with a patient sample at risk for being progressive in adults or in adolescents followed from premenarchial status until skeletal maturity. However, papers on bracing are more frequently found and bracing can be regarded as evidence-based in the conservative management and rehabilitation of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/3">
        <title>2011 SOSORT Guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis During Growth</title>
        <description>Background:
The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT), that produced its first Guidelines in 2005, felt the need to revise them and increase their scientific quality. The aim is to offer to all professionals and their patients an evidence-based updated review of the actual evidence on conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS).
Methods:
All types of professionals (specialty physicians, and allied health professionals) engaged in CTIS have been involved together with a methodologist and a patient representative. A review of all the relevant literature and of the existing Guidelines have been performed. Documents, recommendations, and practical approach flow charts have been developed according to a Delphi procedure. A methodological and practical review has been made, and a final Consensus Session was held during the 2011 Barcelona SOSORT Meeting.
Results:
The contents of the document are: methodology; generalities on idiopathic scoliosis; approach to CTIS in different patients, with practical flow-charts; literature review and recommendations on assessment, bracing, physiotherapy, Physiotherapeutic Specific Exercises (PSE) and other CTIS. Sixty-five recommendations have been given, divided in the following topics: Bracing (20 recommendations), PSE to prevent scoliosis progression during growth (8), PSE during brace treatment and surgical therapy (5), Other conservative treatments (3), Respiratory function and exercises (3), Sports activities (6), Assessment (20). No recommendations reached a Strength of Evidence level I; 2 were level II; 7 level III; and 20 level IV; through the Consensus procedure 26 reached level V and 10 level VI. The Strength of Recommendations was Grade A for 13, B for 49 and C for 3; none had grade D.
Conclusion:
These Guidelines have been a big effort of SOSORT to paint the actual situation of CTIS, starting from the evidence, and filling all the gray areas using a scientific method. According to results, it is possible to understand the lack of research in general on CTIS. SOSORT invites researchers to join, and clinicians to develop good research strategies to allow in the future to support or refute these recommendations according to new and stronger evidence.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angelo Aulisa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorenzo Aulisa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alin Circo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean Claude de Mauroy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacek Durmala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Knott</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toru Maruyama</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvia Minozzi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph O'Brien</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dimitris Padopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Rivard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michele Romano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Wynne</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Villagrasa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fabio Zaina</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/2">
        <title>Biomechanical Evaluation of Predictive Parameters of Progression in Adolescent Isthmic Spondylolisthesis: a computer modeling and simulation study</title>
        <description>Background:
Pelvic incidence, sacral slope and slip percentage have been shown to be important predicting factors for assessing the risk of progression of low- and high-grade spondylolisthesis. Biomechanical factors, which affect the stress distribution and the mechanisms involved in the vertebral slippage, may also influence the risk of progression, but they are still not well known. The objective was to biomechanically evaluate how geometric sacral parameters influence shear and normal stress at the lumbosacral junction in spondylolisthesis.
Methods:
A finite element model of a low-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis was constructed, including the morphology of the spine, pelvis and rib cage based on measurements from biplanar radiographs of a patient. Variations provided on this model aimed to study the effects on low grade spondylolisthesis as well as reproduce high grade spondylolisthesis. Normal and shear stresses at the lumbosacral junction were analyzed under various pelvic incidences, sacral slopes and slip percentages. Their influence on progression risk was statistically analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance.
Results:
Stresses were mainly concentrated on the growth plate of S1, on the intervertebral disc of L5-S1, and ahead the sacral dome for low grade spondylolisthesis. For high grade spondylolisthesis, more important compression and shear stresses were seen in the anterior part of the growth plate and disc as compared to the lateral and posterior areas. Stress magnitudes over this area increased with slip percentage, sacral slope and pelvic incidence. Strong correlations were found between pelvic incidence and the resulting compression and shear stresses in the growth plate and intervertebral disc at the L5-S1 junction.
Conclusions:
Progression of the slippage is mostly affected by a movement and an increase of stresses at the lumbosacral junction in accordance with spino-pelvic parameters. The statistical results provide evidence that pelvic incidence is a predictive parameter to determine progression in isthmic spondylolisthesis.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Amandine Sevrain</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Carl-Eric Aubin</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hicham Gharbi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Xiaoyu Wang</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hubert Labelle</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-18T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-18T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/1">
        <title>Scoliosis short-term rehabilitation (SSTR) according to &amp;apos;Best Practice&amp;apos; standards - are the results repeatable?</title>
        <description>Claims have been made in a pilot study that a new form of short-term rehabilitation according to &apos;Best Practice&apos; standards would change signs and symptoms of patients with scoliosis in the short-term. Aim of this study is to repeat the study published 2010 with a larger sample of patients using the same protocol. Both authors have undergone training in this special approach to scoliosis rehabilitation in 2010.Materials and methods34 patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), 32 girls and 2 boys, average age 13.7 years and an average Cobb angle of 28.7 degrees (21-43 degrees) underwent Scoliosis Short-Term Rehabilitation (SSTR) of seven days. Two days with an intensity of 3 &#215; 90 min sessions/day, and five days with an intensity of 2 &#215; 60 min sessions/day. Angle of trunk rotation (ATR) was measured before and after the time of treatment as well as the active correctability of the ATR after the programme as it has been done in the pilot investigation. Additionally to that, we also recorded the changes in Vital Capacity (VC) before and after the programme.
Results:
ATR was reduced significantly from 11,5 degrees to 8,4 degrees, the active correctability as measured with the Scoliometer (TM) was also reduced significantly from the ATR after treatment 8,9 degrees to 6,5 degrees in the patients with thoracic curves. VC improved significantly (P &lt; 0,05) from 2073 ml to 2326 ml.DiscussionThe results achieved in the pilot investigation published previously are repeatable. The deformity of the trunk can be reduced significantly after SSTR. During the pilot study VC was not investigated. In our study VC improved significantly. Therefore, also shorter rehabilitation times with an appropriate programme seem to be able to change signs and symptoms of a patient with scoliosis. Like the out-patient Schroth programme as described in a study from Turkey, the SSTR provides benefits leading to an improvement of the condition.
Conclusion:
Out-patient rehabilitation following the Scoliologic (TM) &apos;Best Practice&apos; standards seems to provide an improvement of signs and symptoms of scoliosis patients in this study using a pre-/post prospective design. The results of the pilot study therefore seem to be repeatable.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Maksym Borysov</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Artem Borysov</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-17T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-17T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

