<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Scoliosis - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Scoliosis</description>
        <dc:date>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/1/24" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/15" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/1/27" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
        <extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
            <html:div style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
                <html:span style="font-weight:bold">
                    This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central
                </html:span>
                <html:br />
                <html:span style="font-size: 12px;">
                    It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit
                    <html:br />
                    <html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">
                        http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/
                    </html:a>
                    <html:br />
                </html:span>
            </html:div>
        </extra:info>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/6">
        <title>Physical exercises in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis at risk of brace treatment - SOSORT consensus paper 2005</title>
        <description>Background:
Based on a recognized need for research to examine the premise that nonsurgical approaches can be used effectively to treat signs and symptoms of scoliosis, a scientific society on scoliosis orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment (SOSORT) was established in Barcelona in 2004. SOSORT has a primary goal of implementing multidisciplinary research to develop quantitative, objective data to address the role of conservative therapies in the treatment of scoliosis. This international working group of clinicians and scientists specializing in treatment of scoliosis met in Milan, Italy in January 2005.
Methods:
As a baseline for developing a consensus for language and goals for proposed multicenter clinical studies, we developed questionnaires to examine current beliefs, before and after the meeting, regarding (1) the aims of physical exercises; (2) standards of treatment; and (3) the impact of such treatment performed by specialists in the field.
Results:
The responses to the questionnaires show that, in principle, specialists in scoliosis physiotherapy do not disagree and that several features can be regarded, currently, as standard features in the rehabilitation of scoliosis patients. These features include autocorrection in 3D, training in ADL, stabilizing the corrected posture, and patient education.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Hawes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toru Maruyama</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2006, 1:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-6</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/9">
        <title>Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery - a systematic review of the Pub Med literature</title>
        <description>Background:
Spinal fusion surgery is currently recommended when curve magnitude exceeds 40&#8211;45 degrees. Early attempts at spinal fusion surgery which were aimed to leave the patients with a mild residual deformity, failed to meet such expectations. These aims have since been revised to the more modest goals of preventing progression, restoring &apos;acceptability&apos; of the clinical deformity and reducing curvature.In view of the fact that there is no evidence that health related signs and symptoms of scoliosis can be altered by spinal fusion in the long-term, a clear medical indication for this treatment cannot be derived. Knowledge concerning the rate of complications of scoliosis surgery may enable us to establish a cost/benefit relation of this intervention and to improve the standard of the information and advice given to patients. It is also hoped that this study will help to answer questions in relation to the limiting choice between the risks of surgery and the &quot;wait and see &#8211; observation only until surgery might be recommended&quot;, strategy widely used. The purpose of this review is to present the actual data available on the rate of complications in scoliosis surgery.Materials and methodsSearch strategy for identification of studies; Pub Med and the SOSORT scoliosis library, limited to English language and bibliographies of all reviewed articles. The search strategy included the terms; &apos;scoliosis&apos;; &apos;rate of complications&apos;; &apos;spine surgery&apos;; &apos;scoliosis surgery&apos;; &apos;spondylodesis&apos;; &apos;spinal instrumentation&apos; and &apos;spine fusion&apos;.
Results:
The electronic search carried out on the 1st February 2008 with the key words &quot;scoliosis&quot;, &quot;surgery&quot;, &quot;complications&quot; revealed 2590 titles, which not necessarily attributed to our quest for the term &quot;rate of complications&quot;. 287 titles were found when the term &quot;rate of complications&quot; was used as a key word. Rates of complication varied between 0 and 89% depending on the aetiology of the entity investigated. Long-term rates of complications have not yet been reported upon.
Conclusion:
Scoliosis surgery has a varying but high rate of complications. A medical indication for this treatment cannot be established in view of the lack of evidence. The rate of complications may even be higher than reported. Long-term risks of scoliosis surgery have not yet been reported upon in research. Mandatory reporting for all spinal implants in a standardized way using a spreadsheet list of all recognised complications to reveal a 2-year, 5-year, 10-year and 20-year rate of complications should be established. Trials with untreated control groups in the field of scoliosis raise ethical issues, as the control group could be exposed to the risks of undergoing such surgery.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Deborah Goodall</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, 3:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-08-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-9</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-08-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/1/24">
        <title>Pathogenesis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in girls - a double neuro-osseous theory involving disharmony between two nervous systems, somatic and autonomic expressed in the spine and trunk: possible dependency on sympathetic nervous system and hormones with implications for medical therapy</title>
        <description>Anthropometric data from three groups of adolescent girls - preoperative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), screened for scoliosis and normals were analysed by comparing skeletal data between higher and lower body mass index subsets. Unexpected findings for each of skeletal maturation, asymmetries and overgrowth are not explained by prevailing theories of AIS pathogenesis. A speculative pathogenetic theory for girls is formulated after surveying evidence including: (1) the thoracospinal concept for right thoracic AIS in girls; (2) the new neuroskeletal biology relating the sympathetic nervous system to bone formation/resorption and bone growth; (3) white adipose tissue storing triglycerides and the adiposity hormone leptin which functions as satiety hormone and sentinel of energy balance to the hypothalamus for long-term adiposity; and (4) central leptin resistance in obesity and possibly in healthy females. The new theory states that AIS in girls results from developmental disharmony expressed in spine and trunk between autonomic and somatic nervous systems. The autonomic component of this double neuro-osseous theory for AIS pathogenesis in girls involves selectively increased sensitivity of the hypothalamus to circulating leptin (genetically-determined up-regulation possibly involving inhibitory or sensitizing intracellular molecules, such as SOC3, PTP-1B and SH2B1 respectively), with asymmetry as an adverse response (hormesis); this asymmetry is routed bilaterally via the sympathetic nervous system to the growing axial skeleton where it may initiate the scoliosis deformity (leptin-hypothalamic-sympathetic nervous system concept = LHS concept). In some younger preoperative AIS girls, the hypothalamic up-regulation to circulating leptin also involves the somatotropic (growth hormone/IGF) axis which exaggerates the sympathetically-induced asymmetric skeletal effects and contributes to curve progression, a concept with therapeutic implications. In the somatic nervous system, dysfunction of a postural mechanism involving the CNS body schema fails to control, or may induce, the spinal deformity of AIS in girls (escalator concept). Biomechanical factors affecting ribs and/or vertebrae and spinal cord during growth may localize AIS to the thoracic spine and contribute to sagittal spinal shape alterations. The developmental disharmony in spine and trunk is compounded by any osteopenia, biomechanical spinal growth modulation, disc degeneration and platelet calmodulin dysfunction. Methods for testing the theory are outlined. Implications are discussed for neuroendocrine dysfunctions, osteopontin, sympathoactivation, medical therapy, Rett and Prader-Willi syndromes, infantile idiopathic scoliosis, and human evolution. AIS pathogenesis in girls is predicated on two putative normal mechanisms involved in trunk growth, each acquired in evolution and unique to humans.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/1/24</link>
                <dc:creator>R Geoffrey Burwell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ranjit Aujla</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michael Grevitt</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Peter Dangerfield</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alan Moulton</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tabitha Randell</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Susan Anderson</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2009, 4:24</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-10-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-4-24</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>24</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-10-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/2">
        <title>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects</title>
        <description>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a lifetime, probably systemic condition of unknown cause, resulting in a spinal curve or curves of ten degrees or more in about 2.5% of most populations. However, in only about 0.25% does the curve progress to the point that treatment is warranted.Untreated, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not increase mortality rate, even though on rare occasions it can progress to the &gt;100&#176; range and cause premature death. The rate of shortness of breath is not increased, although patients with 50&#176; curves at maturity or 80&#176; curves during adulthood are at increased risk of developing shortness of breath. Compared to non-scoliotic controls, most patients with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis function at or near normal levels. They do have increased pain prevalence and may or may not have increased pain severity. Self-image is often decreased. Mental health is usually not affected. Social function, including marriage and childbearing may be affected, but only at the threshold of relatively larger curves.Non-operative treatment consists of bracing for curves of 25&#176; to 35&#176; or 40&#176; in patients with one to two years or more of growth remaining. Curve progression of &#8805; 6&#176; is 20 to 40% more likely with observation than with bracing. Operative treatment consists of instrumentation and arthrodesis to realign and stabilize the most affected portion of the spine. Lasting curve improvement of approximately 40% is usually achieved.In the most completely studied series to date, at 20 to 28 years follow-up both braced and operated patients had similar, significant, and clinically meaningful reduced function and increased pain compared to non-scoliotic controls. However, their function and pain scores were much closer to normal than patient groups with other, more serious conditions.Risks associated with treatment include temporary decrease in self-image in braced patients. Operated patients face the usual risks of major surgery, a 6 to 29% chance of requiring re-operation, and the remote possibility of developing a pain management problem.Knowledge of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis natural history and long-term treatment effects is and will always remain somewhat incomplete. However, enough is know to provide patients and parents the information needed to make informed decisions about management options.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Marc Asher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Douglas Burton</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2006, 1:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-03-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/15">
        <title>Rare causes of scoliosis and spine deformity: experience and particular features</title>
        <description>Background:
Spine deformity can be idiopathic (more than 80% of cases), neuromuscular, congenital or neurofibromatosis-related. However, there are many disorders that may also be involved. We present our experience treating patients with scoliosis or other spine deformities related to rare clinical entities.
Methods:
A retrospective study of the records of a school-screening study in North-West Greece was performed, covering a 10-year period (1992&#8211;2002). The records were searched for patients with deformities related to rare disorders. These patients were reviewed as regards to characteristics of underlying disorder and spine deformity, treatment and results, complications, intraoperative and anaesthesiologic difficulties particular to each case.
Results:
In 13 cases, the spine deformity presented in relation to rare disorders. The underlying disorder was rare neurological disease in 2 cases (Rett syndrome, progressive hemidystonia), muscular disorders (facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, arthrogryposis) in 2 patients, osteogenesis imperfecta in 2 cases, Marfan syndrome, osteopetrosis tarda, spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia congenita, cleidocranial dysplasia and Noonan syndrome in 1 case each. In 2 cases scoliosis was related to other congenital anomalies (phocomelia, blindness). Nine of these patients were surgically treated. Surgery was avoided in 3 patients.
Conclusion:
This study illustrates the fact that different disorders are related with curves with different characteristics, different accompanying problems and possible complications. Investigation and understanding of the underlying pathology is an essential part of the clinical evaluation and preoperative work-up, as clinical experience at any specific center is limited.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/15</link>
                <dc:creator>Konstantinos Soultanis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alexandros Payatakes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Vasilios Chouliaras</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Georgios Mandellos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Nikolaos Pyrovolou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fani Pliarchopoulou</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Panayotis Soucacos</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2007, 2:15</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2007-10-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-15</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>15</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2007-10-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/2">
        <title>Introduction to the &quot;Scoliosis&quot; Journal Brace Technology Thematic Series: increasing existing knowledge and promoting future developments</title>
        <description>Bracing is the main non-surgical intervention in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis during growth, in hyperkyphosis (and Scheuermann disease) and occasionally for spondylolisthesis; it can be used in adult scoliosis, in the elderly when pathological curves lead to a forward leaning posture or in adults after traumatic injuries. Bracing can be defined as the application of external corrective forces to the trunk; rigid supports or elastic bands can be used and braces can be custom-made or prefabricated. The state of research in the field of conservative treatment is insufficient and while it can be stated that there is some evidence to support bracing, we must also acknowledge that today we do not have a common and generally accepted knowledge base, and that instead, individual expertise still prevails, giving rise to different schools of thought on brace construction and principles of correction. The only way to improve the knowledge and understanding of brace type and brace function is to establish a single and comprehensive source of information about bracing. This is what the Scoliosis Journal is going to do through the &quot;Brace Technology&quot; Thematic Series, where technical papers coming from the different schools will be published.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2010, 5:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-28T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-5-2</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-28T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: description and reliability</title>
        <description>Background:
Spinal classification systems for scoliosis which were developed to correlate with surgical treatment historically have been used in brace treatment as well. Previously, there had not been a scoliosis classification system developed specifically to correlate with brace design and treatment. The purpose of this study is to show the intra- and inter- observer reliability of a new scoliosis classification system correlating with brace treatment.
Methods:
An original classification system (&quot;Rigo Classification&quot;) was developed in order to define specific principles of correction required for efficacious brace design and fabrication. The classification includes radiological as well as clinical criteria. The radiological criteria are utilized to differentiate five basic types of curvatures including: (I) imbalanced thoracic (or three curves pattern), (II) true double (or four curve pattern), (III) balanced thoracic and false double (non 3 non 4), (IV) single lumbar and (V) single thoracolumbar. In addition to the radiological criteria, the Rigo Classification incorporates the curve pattern according to SRS terminology, the balance/imbalance at the transitional point, and L4-5 counter-tilting. To test the intra-and inter-observer reliability of the Rigo Classification, three observers (1 MD, 1 PT and 1 CPO) measured (and one of them, the MD, re-measured) 51 AP radiographs including all curvature types.
Results:
The intra-observer Kappa value was 0.87 (acceptance &gt;0.70). The inter-observer Kappa values fluctuated from 0.61 to 0.81 with an average of 0.71 (acceptance &gt; 0.70).
Conclusions:
A specific scoliosis classification which correlates with brace treatment has been proposed with an acceptable intra-and inter-observer reliability.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Villagrasa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dino Gallo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2010, 5:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-5-1</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/5">
        <title>Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines)</title>
        <description>This guideline has been discussed by the SOSORT guideline committee prior to the SOSORT consensus meeting in Milan, January 2005 and published in its first version on the SOSORT homepage: http://www.sosort.org/meetings.php. After the meeting it again has been discussed by the members of the SOSORT guideline committee to establish the final 2005 version submitted to Scoliosis, the official Journal of the society, in December 2005.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Hawes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toru Maruyama</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Franz Landauer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2006, 1:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-5</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>1</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/4">
        <title>Measurement of vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with low-dose CT in prone position - method description and reliability analysis</title>
        <description>Background:
To our knowledge there is no report in the literature on measurements of vertebral rotation with low-dose computed tomography (CT) in prone position.AimsTo describe and test the reliability of this new method, compare it with other methods in use and evaluate the influence of body position on the degree of vertebral rotation measured by different radiological methods.Study designRetrospective study.
Methods:
25 consecutive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis scheduled for surgery (17 girls, 8 boys) aged 15 &#177; 2 years (mean &#177; SD) were included in the analysis of this study. The degree of the vertebral rotation was in all patients measured according to the method of Perdriolle on standing plain radiographs and on supine CT scanogram, and according to the method of Aaro and Dahlborn on axial CT images in prone position and on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in supine position. The measurements were done by one neuroradiologist at two different occasions. Bland and Altman statistical approach was used in the reliability assessment.
Results:
The reliability of measuring vertebral rotation by axial CT images in prone position was almost perfect with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.95, a random error of the intraobserver differences of 2.3&#176;, a repeatability coefficient of 3.2&#176; and a coefficient of variation of 18.4%. Corresponding values for measurements on CT scanogram were 0.83, 5.1&#176;, 7.2&#176;, and 32.8%, respectively, indicating lower reliability of the latter modality and method. The degree of vertebral rotation measured on standing plain radiographs, prone CT scanogram, axial images on CT in prone position and on MRI in supine position were 25.7 &#177; 9.8&#176;, 21.9 &#177; 8.3&#176;, 17.4 &#177; 7.1&#176;, and 16.1 &#177; 6.5&#176;, respectively. The vertebral rotation measured on axial CT images in prone position was in average 7.5% larger than that measured on axial MRI in supine position.
Conclusions:
This study has shown that measurements of vertebral rotation in prone position were more reliable on axial CT images than on CT scanogram. The measurement of vertebral rotation on CT (corrected to the pelvic tilt) in prone position imposes lower impact of the recumbent position on the vertebral rotation than did MRI in supine position. However, the magnitude of differences is of doubtful clinical significance.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Kasim Abul-Kasim</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Magnus Karlsson</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Ralph Hasserius</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Acke Ohlin</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2010, 5:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-5-4</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>5</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-02-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/1/27">
        <title>Reversal of childhood idiopathic scoliosis in an adult, without surgery: a case report and literature review</title>
        <description>Background:
Some patients with mild or moderate thoracic scoliosis (Cobb angle &lt;50-60 degrees) suffer disproportionate impairment of pulmonary function associated with deformities in the sagittal plane and reduced flexibility of the spine and chest cage. Long-term improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms of childhood onset scoliosis in an adult, without surgical intervention, has not been documented previously.Case presentationA diagnosis of thoracic scoliosis (Cobb angle 45 degrees) with pectus excavatum and thoracic hypokyphosis in a female patient (DOB 9/17/52) was made in June 1964. Immediate spinal fusion was strongly recommended, but the patient elected a daily home exercise program taught during a 6-week period of training by a physical therapist. This regime was carried out through 1992, with daily aerobic exercise added in 1974. The Cobb angle of the primary thoracic curvature remained unchanged. Ongoing clinical symptoms included dyspnea at rest and recurrent respiratory infections. A period of multimodal treatment with clinical monitoring and treatment by an osteopathic physician was initiated when the patient was 40 years old. This included deep tissue massage (1992-1996); outpatient psychological therapy (1992-1993); a daily home exercise program focused on mobilization of the chest wall (1992-2005); and manipulative medicine (1994-1995, 1999-2000). Progressive improvement in chest wall excursion, increased thoracic kyphosis, and resolution of long-standing respiratory symptoms occurred concomitant with a &gt;10 degree decrease in Cobb angle magnitude of the primary thoracic curvature.
Conclusion:
This report documents improved chest wall function and resolution of respiratory symptoms in response to nonsurgical approaches in an adult female, diagnosed at age eleven years with idiopathic scoliosis.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/4/1/27</link>
                <dc:creator>William Brooks</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Elizabeth Krupinski</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Hawes</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2009, 4:27</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-4-27</dc:identifier>
        <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>27</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2009-12-15T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
