<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:extra="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
    <channel rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/feeds/mostaccessed/journal?quantity=&amp;format=rss&amp;version=">
        <title>Scoliosis - Most accessed articles</title>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com</link>
        <description>The most accessed research articles published by Scoliosis</description>
        <dc:date>2012-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/9" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/3" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/5" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/6" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/6/1/17" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/1" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/2" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/4" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/7" />
                                <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/20" />
                            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
                 <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </channel>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/9">
        <title>Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery - a systematic review of the Pub Med literature</title>
        <description>Background:
Spinal fusion surgery is currently recommended when curve magnitude exceeds 40&#8211;45 degrees. Early attempts at spinal fusion surgery which were aimed to leave the patients with a mild residual deformity, failed to meet such expectations. These aims have since been revised to the more modest goals of preventing progression, restoring &apos;acceptability&apos; of the clinical deformity and reducing curvature.In view of the fact that there is no evidence that health related signs and symptoms of scoliosis can be altered by spinal fusion in the long-term, a clear medical indication for this treatment cannot be derived. Knowledge concerning the rate of complications of scoliosis surgery may enable us to establish a cost/benefit relation of this intervention and to improve the standard of the information and advice given to patients. It is also hoped that this study will help to answer questions in relation to the limiting choice between the risks of surgery and the &quot;wait and see &#8211; observation only until surgery might be recommended&quot;, strategy widely used. The purpose of this review is to present the actual data available on the rate of complications in scoliosis surgery.Materials and methodsSearch strategy for identification of studies; Pub Med and the SOSORT scoliosis library, limited to English language and bibliographies of all reviewed articles. The search strategy included the terms; &apos;scoliosis&apos;; &apos;rate of complications&apos;; &apos;spine surgery&apos;; &apos;scoliosis surgery&apos;; &apos;spondylodesis&apos;; &apos;spinal instrumentation&apos; and &apos;spine fusion&apos;.
Results:
The electronic search carried out on the 1st February 2008 with the key words &quot;scoliosis&quot;, &quot;surgery&quot;, &quot;complications&quot; revealed 2590 titles, which not necessarily attributed to our quest for the term &quot;rate of complications&quot;. 287 titles were found when the term &quot;rate of complications&quot; was used as a key word. Rates of complication varied between 0 and 89% depending on the aetiology of the entity investigated. Long-term rates of complications have not yet been reported upon.
Conclusion:
Scoliosis surgery has a varying but high rate of complications. A medical indication for this treatment cannot be established in view of the lack of evidence. The rate of complications may even be higher than reported. Long-term risks of scoliosis surgery have not yet been reported upon in research. Mandatory reporting for all spinal implants in a standardized way using a spreadsheet list of all recognised complications to reveal a 2-year, 5-year, 10-year and 20-year rate of complications should be established. Trials with untreated control groups in the field of scoliosis raise ethical issues, as the control group could be exposed to the risks of undergoing such surgery.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/9</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Deborah Goodall</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, null:9</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-08-05T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-9</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-3-9-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>9</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-08-05T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/3">
        <title>2011 SOSORT Guidelines: Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis During Growth</title>
        <description>Background:
The International Scientific Society on Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT), that produced its first Guidelines in 2005, felt the need to revise them and increase their scientific quality. The aim is to offer to all professionals and their patients an evidence-based updated review of the actual evidence on conservative treatment of idiopathic scoliosis (CTIS).
Methods:
All types of professionals (specialty physicians, and allied health professionals) engaged in CTIS have been involved together with a methodologist and a patient representative. A review of all the relevant literature and of the existing Guidelines have been performed. Documents, recommendations, and practical approach flow charts have been developed according to a Delphi procedure. A methodological and practical review has been made, and a final Consensus Session was held during the 2011 Barcelona SOSORT Meeting.
Results:
The contents of the document are: methodology; generalities on idiopathic scoliosis; approach to CTIS in different patients, with practical flow-charts; literature review and recommendations on assessment, bracing, physiotherapy, Physiotherapeutic Specific Exercises (PSE) and other CTIS. Sixty-five recommendations have been given, divided in the following topics: Bracing (20 recommendations), PSE to prevent scoliosis progression during growth (8), PSE during brace treatment and surgical therapy (5), Other conservative treatments (3), Respiratory function and exercises (3), Sports activities (6), Assessment (20). No recommendations reached a Strength of Evidence level I; 2 were level II; 7 level III; and 20 level IV; through the Consensus procedure 26 reached level V and 10 level VI. The Strength of Recommendations was Grade A for 13, B for 49 and C for 3; none had grade D.
Conclusion:
These Guidelines have been a big effort of SOSORT to paint the actual situation of CTIS, starting from the evidence, and filling all the gray areas using a scientific method. According to results, it is possible to understand the lack of research in general on CTIS. SOSORT invites researchers to join, and clinicians to develop good research strategies to allow in the future to support or refute these recommendations according to new and stronger evidence.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/3</link>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Angelo Aulisa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Lorenzo Aulisa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Alin Circo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jean Claude de Mauroy</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Jacek Durmala</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Patrick Knott</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toru Maruyama</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvia Minozzi</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Joseph O'Brien</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dimitris Padopoulos</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Charles Rivard</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michele Romano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>James Wynne</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Villagrasa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fabio Zaina</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:3</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-3</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-3-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-20T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/5">
        <title>Indications for conservative management of scoliosis (guidelines)</title>
        <description>This guideline has been discussed by the SOSORT guideline committee prior to the SOSORT consensus meeting in Milan, January 2005 and published in its first version on the SOSORT homepage: http://www.sosort.org/meetings.php. After the meeting it again has been discussed by the members of the SOSORT guideline committee to establish the final 2005 version submitted to Scoliosis, the official Journal of the society, in December 2005.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/5</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Hawes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toru Maruyama</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Franz Landauer</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2006, null:5</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-08T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-5</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-1-5-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-08T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/6">
        <title>Physical exercises in the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis at risk of brace treatment - SOSORT consensus paper 2005</title>
        <description>Background:
Based on a recognized need for research to examine the premise that nonsurgical approaches can be used effectively to treat signs and symptoms of scoliosis, a scientific society on scoliosis orthopaedic and rehabilitation treatment (SOSORT) was established in Barcelona in 2004. SOSORT has a primary goal of implementing multidisciplinary research to develop quantitative, objective data to address the role of conservative therapies in the treatment of scoliosis. This international working group of clinicians and scientists specializing in treatment of scoliosis met in Milan, Italy in January 2005.
Methods:
As a baseline for developing a consensus for language and goals for proposed multicenter clinical studies, we developed questionnaires to examine current beliefs, before and after the meeting, regarding (1) the aims of physical exercises; (2) standards of treatment; and (3) the impact of such treatment performed by specialists in the field.
Results:
The responses to the questionnaires show that, in principle, specialists in scoliosis physiotherapy do not disagree and that several features can be regarded, currently, as standard features in the rehabilitation of scoliosis patients. These features include autocorrection in 3D, training in ADL, stabilizing the corrected posture, and patient education.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/6</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Martha Hawes</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Toru Maruyama</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2006, null:6</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-05-11T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-6</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-1-6-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-05-11T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/6/1/17">
        <title>The method of Katharina Schroth  - history, principles and current development</title>
        <description>Katharina Schroth, born February 22nd 1894 in Dresden Germany, was suffering from a moderate scoliosis herself and underwent treatment with a steel brace at the age of 16 years before she decided to develop a more functional approach of treatment for herself.Inspired by a balloon, she tried to correct by breathing away the deformities of her own trunk by inflating the concavities of her body selectively in front of a mirror. She also tried to &apos;mirror&apos; the deformity, by overcorrecting with the help of certain pattern specific corrective movements. She recognized that postural control can only be achieved by changing postural perception.From 1921 this new form of treatment with specific postural correction, correction of breathing patterns and correction of postural perception was performed with rehabilitation times of 3 months in her own little institute in Meissen and in the late 30&apos;s and early 40&apos;s she was supported by her daughter, Christa Schroth.After World War II, Katharina Schroth and her daughter moved to West Germany to open a new little institute in Sobernheim, which constantly grew to a clinic with more than 150 in-patients at a time, treated as a rule for 6 weeks. In the 80&apos;s this institute was renamed to &apos;Katharina Schroth Klinik&apos;. At this time the first studies were carried out and the patient series for the first prospective controlled trial was derived from the patient samples of 1989-1991.Content, rehabilitation times and patients meanwhile have changed, and braces have been developed to offer highest treatment security.Therefore today, bracing in the patient at risk has to be regarded as the primary treatment. We have been able to reduce the training times by adapting the old techniques and introducing new forms of postural education (sagittal correction, ADL correction and experiential learning) whilst the programme is still based on the original approaches of the 3-dimensional treatment according to Katharina Schroth, namely specific postural correction, correction of breathing patterns and correction of postural perception.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/6/1/17</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2011, null:17</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2011-08-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-6-17</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-6-17-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2011-08-30T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/1">
        <title>A specific scoliosis classification correlating with brace treatment: description and reliability</title>
        <description>Background:
Spinal classification systems for scoliosis which were developed to correlate with surgical treatment historically have been used in brace treatment as well. Previously, there had not been a scoliosis classification system developed specifically to correlate with brace design and treatment. The purpose of this study is to show the intra- and inter- observer reliability of a new scoliosis classification system correlating with brace treatment.
Methods:
An original classification system (&quot;Rigo Classification&quot;) was developed in order to define specific principles of correction required for efficacious brace design and fabrication. The classification includes radiological as well as clinical criteria. The radiological criteria are utilized to differentiate five basic types of curvatures including: (I) imbalanced thoracic (or three curves pattern), (II) true double (or four curve pattern), (III) balanced thoracic and false double (non 3 non 4), (IV) single lumbar and (V) single thoracolumbar. In addition to the radiological criteria, the Rigo Classification incorporates the curve pattern according to SRS terminology, the balance/imbalance at the transitional point, and L4-5 counter-tilting. To test the intra-and inter-observer reliability of the Rigo Classification, three observers (1 MD, 1 PT and 1 CPO) measured (and one of them, the MD, re-measured) 51 AP radiographs including all curvature types.
Results:
The intra-observer Kappa value was 0.87 (acceptance &gt;0.70). The inter-observer Kappa values fluctuated from 0.61 to 0.81 with an average of 0.71 (acceptance &gt; 0.70).
Conclusions:
A specific scoliosis classification which correlates with brace treatment has been proposed with an acceptable intra-and inter-observer reliability.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/5/1/1</link>
                <dc:creator>Manuel Rigo</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Monica Villagrasa</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Dino Gallo</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2010, null:1</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-5-1</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-5-1-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2010-01-27T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/2">
        <title>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: natural history and long term treatment effects</title>
        <description>Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a lifetime, probably systemic condition of unknown cause, resulting in a spinal curve or curves of ten degrees or more in about 2.5% of most populations. However, in only about 0.25% does the curve progress to the point that treatment is warranted.Untreated, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not increase mortality rate, even though on rare occasions it can progress to the &gt;100&#176; range and cause premature death. The rate of shortness of breath is not increased, although patients with 50&#176; curves at maturity or 80&#176; curves during adulthood are at increased risk of developing shortness of breath. Compared to non-scoliotic controls, most patients with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis function at or near normal levels. They do have increased pain prevalence and may or may not have increased pain severity. Self-image is often decreased. Mental health is usually not affected. Social function, including marriage and childbearing may be affected, but only at the threshold of relatively larger curves.Non-operative treatment consists of bracing for curves of 25&#176; to 35&#176; or 40&#176; in patients with one to two years or more of growth remaining. Curve progression of &#8805; 6&#176; is 20 to 40% more likely with observation than with bracing. Operative treatment consists of instrumentation and arthrodesis to realign and stabilize the most affected portion of the spine. Lasting curve improvement of approximately 40% is usually achieved.In the most completely studied series to date, at 20 to 28 years follow-up both braced and operated patients had similar, significant, and clinically meaningful reduced function and increased pain compared to non-scoliotic controls. However, their function and pain scores were much closer to normal than patient groups with other, more serious conditions.Risks associated with treatment include temporary decrease in self-image in braced patients. Operated patients face the usual risks of major surgery, a 6 to 29% chance of requiring re-operation, and the remote possibility of developing a pain management problem.Knowledge of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis natural history and long-term treatment effects is and will always remain somewhat incomplete. However, enough is know to provide patients and parents the information needed to make informed decisions about management options.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/1/1/2</link>
                <dc:creator>Marc Asher</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Douglas Burton</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2006, null:2</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2006-03-31T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-1-2</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-1-2-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2006-03-31T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/4">
        <title>Physical therapy intervention studies on idiopathic scoliosis-review with the focus on inclusion criteria1</title>
        <description>Background:
Studies investigating the outcome of conservative scoliosis treatment differ widely with respect to the inclusion criteria used. This study has been performed to investigate the possibility to find useful inclusion criteria for future prospective studies on physiotherapy (PT).Materials and methodsA PubMed search for outcome papers on PT was performed in order to detect study designs and inclusion criteria used.
Results:
Real outcome papers (start of treatment in immature samples/end results after the end of growth; controlled studies in adults with scoliosis with a follow-up of more than 5 years) have not been found. Some papers investigated mid-term effects of exercises, most were retrospective, few prospective and many included patient samples with questionable treatment indications.
Conclusion:
There is no outcome paper on PT in scoliosis with a patient sample at risk for being progressive in adults or in adolescents followed from premenarchial status until skeletal maturity. However, papers on bracing are more frequently found and bracing can be regarded as evidence-based in the conservative management and rehabilitation of idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/4</link>
                <dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:4</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-4</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-4-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-01-25T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/7">
        <title>Pulmonary function in children with idiopathic scoliosis</title>
        <description>Idiopathic scoliosis, a common disorder of lateral displacement and rotation of vertebral bodies during periods of rapid somatic growth, has many effects on respiratory function. Scoliosis results in a restrictive lung disease with a multifactorial decrease in lung volumes, displaces the intrathoracic organs, impedes on the movement of ribs and affects the mechanics of the respiratory muscles. Scoliosis decreases the chest wall as well as the lung compliance and results in increased work of breathing at rest, during exercise and sleep. Pulmonary hypertension and respiratory failure may develop in severe disease. In this review the epidemiological and anatomical aspects of idiopathic scoliosis are noted, the pathophysiology and effects of idiopathic scoliosis on respiratory function are described, the pulmonary function testing including lung volumes, respiratory flow rates and airway resistance, chest wall movements, regional ventilation and perfusion, blood gases, response to exercise and sleep studies are presented. Preoperative pulmonary function testing required, as well as the effects of various surgical approaches on respiratory function are also discussed.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/7/1/7</link>
                <dc:creator>Theofanis Tsiligiannis</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Theodoros Grivas</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2012, null:7</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2012-03-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-7-7</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-7-7-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>7</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2012-03-23T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>PDF</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/20">
        <title>Adult scoliosis can be reduced through specific SEAS exercises: a case report</title>
        <description>Background:
It has been known since many years that scoliosis can continue to progress after skeletal maturity: the rate of progression has shown to be linear, and it can be used to establish an individual prognosis. Once there is progression there is an indication for treatment: usually it is proposed a surgical one. There are very few papers on an alternative rehabilitation approach; since many years we propose specific SEAS exercises and the aim of this study is to present one case report on this approach.Case presentationAll radiographs have been measured blindly twice using the same protractor by one expert physician whose repeatability error proved to be &lt; 3&#176; Cobb; the average measurement has been used. In this case a 25 years old female scoliosis patient, previously treated from 14 (Risser 1) to 19 years of age with a decrease of the curve from 46&#176; to 37&#176;, showed a progression of 10&#176; Cobb in 6 years. The patient has then been treated with SEAS exercises only, and in one year progression has been reverted from 47&#176; to 28.5&#176;.
Conclusion:
A scoliosis curve is made of different components: the structural bony and ligamentous components, and a postural one that counts up to 9&#176; in children, while it has not been quantified in adults. This case shows that when adult scoliosis aggravates it is possible to intervene with specific exercises (SEAS) not just to get stability, but to recover last years collapse. The reduction of scoliotic curve through rehabilitation presumably does not indicate a reduction of the bone deformity, but rely on a recovery of the upright postural collapse. This reduction can decrease the chronic asymmetric load on the spine and, in the long run, reduce the risks of progression.</description>
        <link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/20</link>
                <dc:creator>Alessandra Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Silvana Parzini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Maria Gabriella Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Michele Romano</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Salvatore Atanasio</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Fabio Zaina</dc:creator>
                <dc:creator>Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
                <dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, null:20</dc:source>
        <dc:date>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
        <dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-20</dc:identifier>
                                <prism:require>/content/figures/1748-7161-3-20-toc.gif</prism:require>
                <prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
        <prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
        <prism:volume>${item.volume}</prism:volume>
        <prism:startingPage>20</prism:startingPage>
        <prism:publicationDate>2008-12-16T00:00:00Z</prism:publicationDate>
                <prism:versionidentifier>XML</prism:versionidentifier>
                <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/" />
    </item>
        <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
        <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
    </cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>

