<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/rss/styledrssBMC.css" type="text/css"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:extra="http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/schemas/extra/" xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.biomedcentral.com/rss">
		<extra:info rdf:parseType="Literal">
			<html:div xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" style="font:14px Verdana, Geneva, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">
				<html:span style="font-weight:bold">This is an RSS newsfeed from BioMed Central</html:span>
				<html:br/>
				<html:span style="font-size: 12px;">It is intended to be used with an RSS reader. For more information about RSS newsfeeds from BioMed Central, visit <html:br/><html:a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/" style="color:#3333CC; font-size:12px;">http://www.biomedcentral.com/info/about/rss/</html:a><html:br/>
				</html:span>
			</html:div>
		</extra:info>
		<title>Scoliosis - Latest articles</title>
		<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com</link>
		<description>The latest articles from Scoliosis (ISSN 1748-7161) published by 
				
				BioMed Central
		</description>
        <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        <items>
            <rdf:Seq>
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/6"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/5"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/4"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/3"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/2"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/1"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/19"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/18"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/17"/>			    
            
				    <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/16"/>			    
            
            </rdf:Seq>
        </items>
    </channel>  
    
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/6">
            
            <title>Surgical treatment of scoliosis: a review of techniques currently applied</title>
			<description>In this review, basic knowledge and recent innovation of surgical treatment for scoliosis will be described. Surgical treatment for scoliosis is indicated, in general, for the curve exceeding 45 or 50 degrees by the Cobb's method on the ground that:1) Curves larger than 50 degrees progress even after skeletal maturity.2) Curves of greater magnitude cause loss of pulmonary function, and much larger curves cause respiratory failure.3) Larger the curve progress, more difficult to treat with surgery.Posterior fusion with instrumentation has been a standard of the surgical treatment for scoliosis. In modern instrumentation systems, more anchors are used to connect the rod and the spine, resulting in better correction and less frequent implant failures. Segmental pedicle screw constructs or hybrid constructs using pedicle screws, hooks, and wires are the trend of today.Anterior instrumentation surgery had been a choice of treatment for the thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis because better correction can be obtained with shorter fusion levels. Recently, superiority of anterior surgery for the thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis has been lost. Initial enthusiasm for anterior instrumentation for the thoracic curve using video assisted thoracoscopic surgery technique has faded out.Various attempts are being made with use of fusionless surgery. To control growth, epiphysiodesis on the convex side of the deformity with or without instrumentation is a technique to provide gradual progressive correction and to arrest the deterioration of the curves. To avoid fusion for skeletally immature children with spinal cord injury or myelodysplasia, vertebral wedge ostetomies are performed for the treatment of progressive paralytic scoliosis. For right thoracic curve with idiopathic scoliosis, multiple vertebral wedge osteotomies without fusion are performed. To provide correction and maintain it during the growing years while allowing spinal growth for early onset scoliosis, technique of instrumentation without fusion or with limited fusion using dual rod instrumentation has been developed. To increase the volume of the thorax in thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with fused ribs and congenital scoliosis, vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs has been developed.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/6</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Toru Maruyama and Katsushi Takeshita</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, 3:6</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-04-18</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-6</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>6</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-04-18</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/5">
            
            <title>Using a synthesis of the research literature related to the aetiology of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis to provide ideas on future directions for success</title>
			<description>This review is atypical by design. It has used a synthesis of the available literature relating to the aetiology of AIS to draw attention to the lack of progress in this area despite intensive research for more than 100 years. The review has argued that if progress is to be made in this area then significant changes in approach to the problem must be made. Such changes have been outlined and major areas of potential focus identified with the intention of creating debate and discussion. There is no doubt that people are working hard in this area of research but this review has deliberately attempted to question its achievements and future directions."It is not enough to be busy, so are the ants. The question is what are you so busy about.'Walden &#8211; Henry David Thoreau</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/5</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Keith M Bagnall</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, 3:5</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-02-02</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-5</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>5</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/4">
            
            <title>Acupucture in the treatment of scoliosis &#8211; a single blind controlled pilot study</title>
			<description>Background:
Today, acupuncture therapy is commonly used for pain control throughout the world, although the putative mechanisms are still unclear. A Pub Med search for the key words "Acupuncture" and "Scoliosis" reveals 3 papers only, not containing any results of studies designed for the treatment of scoliosis with the help of acupuncture. Because of this lack of trials especially designed for the treatment of scoliosis this pilot study has been performed.
Methods:
24 girls undergoing in-patient rehabilitation, 14 &#8211; 16 years of age (at average 15,1 years, SD 0,74) with the diagnosis of an Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) have agreed to take part in this controlled single blind crossover study. Average Cobb angle was 33 degrees (SD 9,2) ranging from 16 to 49 degrees. 10 of the girls had a thoracic, one a lumbar, 7 a double major and 6 a thoracolumbar curve pattern. The patients have been scanned with the Formetric&#174; surface topography measurement system before and after lying on the left side [L], before and after sham acupuncture [S] and before and after real acupuncture [R].
Results:
For the whole group of patients no significant changes have been found during lying, sham acupuncture or real acupuncture. There were no differences between the patient groups with different curve pattern. In the explorative subgroup analysis of Patients with curvatures from 16 to 35 degrees, however significant changes in surface rotation have been found after R intervention as well as a strong differences in lateral deviation while in the L or S intervention no real changes have been achieved.
Conclusion:
One session with real (verum) acupuncture seems to have an influence on the deformity of scoliosis patients with no more than 35 degrees. The findings during verum acupuncture clearly are different to sham acupuncture or just lying, while in the whole group of patients also including patients with curvatures of more than 35 degrees no obvious changes have been found. The results of this study justify further investigation of the effect of acupuncture in the treatment of patients with scoliosis.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/4</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss, Silvia Bohr, Anja Jahnke and Sandra Pleines</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, 3:4</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-28</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-4</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>4</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-28</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/3">
            
            <title>The vertebral body growth plate in scoliosis: a primary disturbance of growth?</title>
			<description>Study Design and AimsThis was an observational pilot study of the vertebral body growth plates in scoliosis involving high-resolution coronal plane magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and histological examination. One aim of this study was to determine whether vertebral body growth plates in scoliosis demonstrated abnormalities on MR imaging. A second aim was to determine if a relationship existed between MR and histological abnormalities in these vertebral body growth plates.
Methods:
MR imaging sequences of 18 patients demonstrated the vertebral body growth plates well enough to detect gross abnormalities/deficient areas/zones. Histological examination of ten vertebral body growth plates removed during routine scoliosis surgery was performed. Observational histological comparison with MR images was possible in four cases.
Results:
Four of the 18 MR images demonstrated spines with normal curvature and normal vertebral body growth plates. In 13 scoliotic spines, convex and concave side growth plate deficiencies were observed most frequently at or near the apex of the curve. One MR image demonstrated a 55&#176; kyphosis and no convex or concave side deficiencies. The degree of vertebral body wedging was independent of the presence of vertebral body growth plate deficiency. Histological abnormalities of the vertebral body growth plates were demonstrated in four with MR imaging abnormalities.
Conclusion:
This study demonstrated MR image abnormalities of scoliotic vertebral body growth plates compared to controls. A qualitative relationship was demonstrated between MR imaging and histological abnormalities. The finding that vertebral body growth plate deficiencies occurred both on the convex and concave sides of the spine, closest to the apical vertebra of the scoliosis curve, implied that they are less likely to be the result of adaptive changes to the physical forces involved in the scoliotic deformity. One explanation is that they represent a primary disturbance of growth.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/3</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Gregory Day, Kieran Frawley, Gael Phillips, I Bruce McPhee, Robert Labrom, Geoffrey Askin and Peter Mueller</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, 3:3</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-3</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>3</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/2">
            
            <title>Manual therapy as a conservative treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review</title>
			<description>Background:
The treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is contingent upon many variables. Simple observation is enough for less serious curvatures, but for very serious cases surgical intervention could be proposed. Between these there is a wide range of different treatments. Manual therapy is commonly used: the aim of this paper is to verify the data existing in the literature on the efficacy of this approach.
Methods:
A systematic review of the scientific literature published internationally has been performed. We have included in the term manual therapy all the manipulative and generally passive techniques performed by an external operator. In a more specific meaning, osteopathic, chiropractic and massage techniques have been considered as manipulative therapeutic methods. We performed our systematic research in Medline, Embase, Cinhal, Cochrane Library, Pedro with the following terms: idiopathic scoliosis combined with chiropractic; manipulation; mobilization; manual therapy; massage; osteopathy; and therapeutic manipulation. The criteria for inclusion were as follows: Any kind of research; diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; patients treated exclusively by one of the procedures established as a standard for this review (chiropractic manipulation, osteopathic techniques, massage); and outcome in Cobb degrees.
Results:
We founded 145 texts, but only three papers were relevant to our study. However, no one of the three satisfied all the required inclusion criteria because they were characterized by a combination of manual techniques and other therapeutic approaches.
Conclusion:
The lack of any kind of serious scientific data does not allow us to draw any conclusion on the efficacy of manual therapy as an efficacious technique for the treatment of Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/2</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Michele Romano and Stefano Negrini</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, 3:2</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-22</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-2</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>2</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-22</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/1">
            
            <title>Trunk rotation and hip joint range of rotation in adolescent girls with idiopathic scoliosis: does the "dinner plate" turn asymmetrically ?</title>
			<description>Background:
In patients with structural idiopathic scoliosis the body asymmetries involve the pelvis and the lower limbs; they are included in many theories debating the pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis.
Methods:
Hip joint range of motion was studied in 158 adolescent girls, aged 10&#8211;18 years (mean 14.2 &#177; 2.0) with structural idiopathic scoliosis of 20&#8211;83&#176; of Cobb angle (mean 43.0&#176; &#177; 14.5&#176;) and compared to 57 controls, sex and age matched. Hip range of rotation was examined in prone position, the pelvis level controlled with an inclinometer; hip adduction was tested in five different positions.
Results:
In girls with structural scoliosis the symmetry of hip rotation was less frequent (p = 0.0047), the difference between left and right hip range of internal rotation was significantly higher (p = 0.0013), and the static rotational offset of the pelvis, calculated from the mid-points of rotation, revealed significantly greater (p = 0.0092) than in healthy controls. The detected asymmetries comprised no limitation of hip range of motion, but a transposition of the sector of motion, mainly towards internal rotation in one hip and external rotation in the opposite hip. The data failed to demonstrate the curve type, the Cobb angle, the angle of trunk rotation or the curve progression factor to be related to the hip joint asymmetrical range of motion.
Conclusion:
Numerous asymmetries around the hip were detected, most of them were expressed equally in scoliotics and in controls. Pathogenic implications concern producing a "torsional offset" of muscles patterns of activation around the spine in adolescent girls with structural idiopathic scoliosis during gait.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/3/1/1</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki, Agata Walczak and Andrzej Szulc</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2008, 3:1</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2008-01-19</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-3-1</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2008-01-19</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/19">
            
            <title>Is there a body of evidence for the treatment of patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)?</title>
			<description>Historically, the treatment options for AIS, the most common form of scoliosis are; exercises; in-patient rehabilitation; braces and surgery. While there is evidence in the form of prospective controlled studies that Scoliosis Intensive Rehabilitation (SIR) and braces can alter the natural history of the condition, there is no prospective controlled study comparing the natural history with surgical treatment.One aim of the Scoliosis Society (SOSORT) should be; to help develop a body of research regarding the outcomes of conservative and operative treatment as well, and to highlight the problems of treatment indications in patients with AIS and other spinal deformities. Another aim is to help to improve the safety of patients who have surgery. By producing evidence-based information that can be used to develop guidelines that could aid both professionals and patients in making decisions about surgical and conservative options.Although 'Scoliosis' is the official journal of the SOSORT and is the main forum for experts in the field of conservative management of patients with spinal deformities, there needs to be more wide spread attempt to develop a fuller body of evidence focussing on spine surgery as well.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/19</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Hans-Rudolf Weiss</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2007, 2:19</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-12-31</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-19</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>19</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-31</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/18">
            
            <title>Discrepancy in clinical versus radiological parameters describing deformity due to brace treatment for moderate idiopathic scoliosis</title>
			<description>Background:
The shape of the torso in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is considered to reflect the shape of the vertebral column, however the direct correlation between parameters describing clinical deformity and those characterizing radiological curvature was reported to be weak. It is not clear if the management proposed for scoliosis (physiotherapy, brace, surgery) affects equally the shape of the axial skeleton and the surface of the body. The aim of the study was to compare clinical deformity of (1) idiopathic scoliosis girls being under brace treatment for radiological curves of 25 to 40 degrees and (2) non treated scoliotic girls matched for age and Cobb angle.
Methods:
Cross-sectional study of 24 girls wearing the brace versus 26 girls without brace treatment, matched for age and Cobb angle. Hypothesis: Patients wearing the brace for more than 6 months, when comparing to patients without brace, may present different external morphology of the trunk, in spite of having similar Cobb angle. Material. Inclusion criteria: girls, idiopathic scoliosis, growing age (10&#8211;16 years), Cobb angle minimum 25&#176;, maximum 40&#176;. The braced group consisted of girls wearing a TLSO brace (Cheneau) for more than 6 months with minimum of 16 hours per day. The non-braced group consisted of girls first seen for their spinal deformity, previously not treated. The groups presented similar curve pattern. Methods. Scoliometer exam: angle of trunk rotation at three levels of the spine: upper thoracic, main thoracic, lumbar or thoracolumbar. The maximal angle was noted at each level and the sum of three levels was calculated. Posterior trunk symmetry index (POTSI) and Hump Sum were measured using surface topography.
Results:
Cobb angle was 34.9&#176; &#177; 4.8&#176; in braced and 32.7&#176; &#177; 4.9&#176; in un-braced patients (difference not significant). The age was 14.1 &#177; 1.6 years in braced patients and 13.1 &#177; 1.9 years in un-braced group (p = 0.046). The value of angle of trunk rotation in the main curvature was 8.4&#176; &#177; 2.7&#176;in braced and 11.4&#176; &#177; 2.7&#176; in un-braced patients (difference extremely significant, p = 0.0003). The value of the sum of angles of trunk rotation at three levels of the trunk was 12.8&#176; &#177; 4.6&#176; in braced and 16.5&#176; &#177; 3.8&#176; in un-braced patients (difference very significant, p = 0.0038). The POTSI did not differ significantly between the groups (p = 0.78), the Hump Sum values were not quite different (p = 0.07).
Conclusion:
(1) Adolescent girls wearing the brace for idiopathic scoliosis of 25 to 40 degrees of Cobb angle, reveal smaller clinical rotational deformity of their back than non-treated girls having similar radiological deformity. (2) Evaluation of the results of treatment for idiopathic scoliosis should consider parameters describing both clinical and radiological deformity.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/18</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Tomasz Kotwicki, Edyta Kinel, Wanda Stryla and Andrzej Szulc</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2007, 2:18</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-12-03</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-18</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>18</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-12-03</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/17">
            
            <title>SOSORT consensus paper: school screening for scoliosis. Where are we today?</title>
			<description>This report is the SOSORT Consensus Paper on School Screening for Scoliosis discussed at the 4th International Conference on Conservative Management of Spinal Deformities, presented by SOSORT, on May 2007. The objectives were numerous, 1) the inclusion of the existing information on the issue, 2) the analysis and discussion of the responses by the meeting attendees to the twenty six questions of the questionnaire, 3) the impact of screening on frequency of surgical treatment and of its discontinuation, 4) the reasons why these programs must be continued, 5) the evolving aim of School Screening for Scoliosis and 6) recommendations for improvement of the procedure.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/17</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Theodoros B Grivas, Marian H Wade, Stefano Negrini, Joseph P O'Brien, Toru Maruyama, Martha C Hawes, Manuel Rigo, Hans Rudolf Weiss, Tomasz Kotwicki, Elias S Vasiliadis, Lior Neuhaus Sulam and Tamar Neuhous</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2007, 2:17</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-11-26</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-17</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-26</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
	
		<item rdf:about="http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/16">
            
            <title>Biomechanical simulations of the scoliotic deformation process in the pinealectomized chicken: a preliminary study</title>
			<description>Background:
The basic mechanisms whereby mechanical factors modulate the metabolism of the growing spine remain poorly understood, especially the role of growth adaptation in spinal disorders like in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). This paper presents a finite element model (FEM) that was developed to simulate early stages of scoliotic deformities progression using a pinealectomized chicken as animal model.
Methods:
The FEM includes basic growth and growth modulation created by the muscle force imbalance. The experimental data were used to adapt a FEM previously developed to simulate the scoliosis deformation process in human. The simulations of the spine deformation process are compared with the results of an experimental study including a group of pinealectomized chickens.
Results:
The comparison of the simulation results of the spine deformation process (Cobb angle of 37&#176;) is in agreement with experimental scoliotic deformities of two representative cases (Cobb angle of 41&#176; and 30&#176;). For the vertebral wedging, a good agreement is also observed between the calculated (28&#176;) and the observed (25&#176; &#8211; 30&#176;) values.
Conclusion:
The proposed biomechanical model presents a novel approach to realistically simulate the scoliotic deformation process in pinealectomized chickens and investigate different parameters influencing the progression of scoliosis.</description>
			<link>http://www.scoliosisjournal.com/content/2/1/16</link>
			
			 	<dc:creator>Pierre Lafortune, Carl-&#201;ric Aubin, Hugo Boulanger, Isabelle Villemure, Keith M Bagnall and Alain Moreau</dc:creator>
			
			<dc:source>Scoliosis 2007, 2:16</dc:source>
			<dc:date>2007-11-09</dc:date>
			<dc:identifier>doi:10.1186/1748-7161-2-16</dc:identifier>
			
			
							
					<prism:publicationName>Scoliosis</prism:publicationName>
					
			
							
					<prism:issn>1748-7161</prism:issn>
					
			
							
					<prism:volume>2</prism:volume>
					
			
							
					<prism:startingPage>16</prism:startingPage>
					
			
							
					<prism:publicationDate>2007-11-09</prism:publicationDate>
					

            <cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/"/>
        </item>
		
    <cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/">
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution"/>
         <cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks"/>
	</cc:License>
</rdf:RDF>
